HENCILE DORSEY v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida

HENCILE DORSEY v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 16, 2023

Docket23-1057

StatusPublished

This text of HENCILE DORSEY v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (HENCILE DORSEY v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

HENCILE DORSEY v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed August 16, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-1057 Lower Tribunal Nos. F19-13538, & F19-13541 ________________

Hencile Dorsey, Petitioner,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.

Hencile Dorsey, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kayla Heather McNab, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before MILLER, LOBREE, and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Dismissed without prejudice to the filing of a motion to review the denial

of post-trial release. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.691(c); Fla. R. App. P.

9.140(h)(4); Petersen v. State, 187 So. 3d 283, 285 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016);

Robinson v. State, 201 So. 3d 666, 667–68 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI