HENCILE DORSEY v. KIMBERLEE JO PERRETTA, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 22, 2023·No. 22-0028·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed March 22, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D22-0028

Lower Tribunal No. 21-21312

Hencile Dorsey,

Appellant,

vs.

Kimberlee Jo Perretta, etc., Appellee.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Peter R.

Lopez, Judge.

Hencile Dorsey, in proper person.

Law Office of Vivian T. Figueras, and Vivian T. Figueras, for appellee.

Before SCALES, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.

MILLER, J.

In this quiet title action, appellant, Hencile Dorsey, challenges a default final judgment rendered in favor of appellee, Kimberlee Jo Perretta, as personal representative of the Estate of James Rodney Hicks. On appeal, Dorsey contends the judgment is void because service of process was defective. He specifically alleges he was incarcerated in a correctional facility at the time process was served, yet the return of service reflects substitute service on his mother at her private residence. See Shurman v. Atl. Mortg. & Inv. Corp., 795 So. 2d 952, 955 (Fla. 2001) (holding incarcerated inmate’s “usual place of abode” is correctional facility for purposes of substitute service under section 48.031, Florida Statutes). The propriety of service has not yet been litigated below. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment under review without prejudice to Dorsey pursuing his pending motion to quash service in the trial court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HENCILE DORSEY v. KIMBERLEE JO PERRETTA, etc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

HENCILE DORSEY v. KIMBERLEE JO PERRETTA, etc. (HENCILE DORSEY v. KIMBERLEE JO PERRETTA, etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shurman v. Atlantic Mortg. & Inv. Corp.
795 So. 2d 952 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)