Henao v. Parts Authority, LLC
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wae eK DAVIDSON HENAO et al., : Plaintiffs, : : 19 Civ. 10720 (LGS) -against- : : ORDER PARTS AUTHORITY, LLC, et al., : Defendants. : LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, on March 3, 2022, the parties filed a letter motion for approval of a proposed settlement for the remaining plaintiffs in this action. WHEREAS, if a FLSA settlement agreement provides for attorneys’ fees and costs, courts must “evaluate the reasonableness of the fees and costs.” Fisher v. SD Prot. Inc., 948 F.3d 493, 599 (2d Cir. 2020). It is hereby ORDERED that by March 18, 2022, in support of their motion for approval of the settlement, Plaintiffs’ counsel shall file billing records documenting, for each attorney, the date, the hours expended, and the nature of the work done. Dated: March 11, 2022 New York, New York .
LORNA G. SCHOFIEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Henao v. Parts Authority, LLC (Henao v. Parts Authority, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.