Henao v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Henao v. Coughlin

133 A.D.2d 828, 520 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51864

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 26, 1987·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondents to give the petitioner certain medication to relieve pain suffered as a result of a stroke, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered November 21, 1984, which dismissed the proceeding.

[829] Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There is no evidence that prison officials have been deliberately indifferent to the petitioner’s medical needs (cf., People ex rel. Hall v LeFevre, 60 NY2d 579). It appears that he is receiving proper medical care. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Lawrence, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondents to give the petitioner certain medication to relieve pain suffered as a result of a stroke, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered November 21, 1984, which dismissed the proceeding.

[829] Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There is no evidence that prison officials have been deliberately indifferent to the petitioner’s medical needs (cf., People ex rel. Hall v LeFevre, 60 NY2d 579). It appears that he is receiving proper medical care. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Lawrence, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Henao v. Coughlin, 133 A.D.2d 828, 520 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

133 A.D.2d 828 (Henao v. Coughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related