Henao v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Henao v. Coughlin

133 A.D.2d 828, 520 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51864

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 26, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 133 A.D.2d 828 (Henao v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henao v. Coughlin, 133 A.D.2d 828, 520 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondents to give the petitioner certain medication to relieve pain suffered as a result of a stroke, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered November 21, 1984, which dismissed the proceeding.

[829]*829Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There is no evidence that prison officials have been deliberately indifferent to the petitioner’s medical needs (cf., People ex rel. Hall v LeFevre, 60 NY2d 579). It appears that he is receiving proper medical care. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Lawrence, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondents to give the petitioner certain medication to relieve pain suffered as a result of a stroke, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered November 21, 1984, which dismissed the proceeding.

[829]*829Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There is no evidence that prison officials have been deliberately indifferent to the petitioner’s medical needs (cf., People ex rel. Hall v LeFevre, 60 NY2d 579). It appears that he is receiving proper medical care. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Lawrence, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 A.D.2d 828, 520 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henao-v-coughlin-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack