Hempstead Shoe Co. v. Jack's Bootery, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hempstead Shoe Co. v. Jack's Bootery, Inc.

282 A.D. 731, 122 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4819

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 731 (Hempstead Shoe Co. v. Jack's Bootery, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hempstead Shoe Co. v. Jack's Bootery, Inc., 282 A.D. 731, 122 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action based on unfair competition in the use of a trade name in the same line of business, appellant contends that the name, “Mack’s Bootery, Inc.” is a simulation or imitation of the name “Jack’s Shoes,” and that respondents have in other ways held themselves out as connected or associated with appellant’s business. Order denying appellant’s motion to punish respondents for contempt of the judgment affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action based on unfair competition in the use of a trade name in the same line of business, appellant contends that the name, “Mack’s Bootery, Inc.” is a simulation or imitation of the name “Jack’s Shoes,” and that respondents have in other ways held themselves out as connected or associated with appellant’s business. Order denying appellant’s motion to punish respondents for contempt of the judgment affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 731, 122 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hempstead-shoe-co-v-jacks-bootery-inc-nyappdiv-1953.