Hempstead Marine, Inc. v. R & I Shipping Line, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hempstead Marine, Inc. v. R & I Shipping Line, LLC

245 So. 3d 1006

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 30, 2018

DocketNos. 3D17–1161 & 3D17–1155

StatusPublished

This text of 245 So. 3d 1006 (Hempstead Marine, Inc. v. R & I Shipping Line, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hempstead Marine, Inc. v. R & I Shipping Line, LLC, 245 So. 3d 1006 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See St. Joe Corp. v. McIver, 875 So.2d 375, 381 (Fla. 2004) ("Generally, where the parties acknowledge creation of a contract and the disagreement concerns their varying understandings about certain terms, such questions are properly submitted to a jury."); Pan American Bancshares, Inc. v. Trask, 278 So.2d 313, 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973) (when parties to an oral contract dispute their "understanding as to certain terms," the question is "properly submitted to the jury.").

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See St. Joe Corp. v. McIver, 875 So.2d 375, 381 (Fla. 2004) ("Generally, where the parties acknowledge creation of a contract and the disagreement concerns their varying understandings about certain terms, such questions are properly submitted to a jury."); Pan American Bancshares, Inc. v. Trask, 278 So.2d 313, 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973) (when parties to an oral contract dispute their "understanding as to certain terms," the question is "properly submitted to the jury.").

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 So. 3d 1006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hempstead-marine-inc-v-r-i-shipping-line-llc-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack