Hempstead Bottling Works Corp. v. Patterson

282 A.D. 1063, 126 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5829
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 21, 1953·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, respondents, constituting the Town Board of the Town of Hemp-stead, appeal from an order, which annulled its determination denying petitioner’s application for a zoning variance.” The order appealed from remitted the proceeding to the said board for further consideration and determination. Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The order is not appeal-able. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1304; Matter of Bly v. Witmer, 263 App. Div. 1069; Matter of Francisco v. O’Connell, 274 App. Div. 796.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hempstead Bottling Works Corp. v. Patterson, 282 A.D. 1063, 126 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

282 A.D. 1063 (Hempstead Bottling Works Corp. v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Soros v. Board of Appeals
24 A.D.2d 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
North American Holding Corp. v. Murdock
6 A.D.2d 596 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)