Hempp v. F. W. Woolworth & Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Hempp v. F. W. Woolworth & Co.

87 A. 1118, 84 N.J.L. 407, 55 Vroom 407, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 192

DecidedMarch 3, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 87 A. 1118 (Hempp v. F. W. Woolworth & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hempp v. F. W. Woolworth & Co., 87 A. 1118, 84 N.J.L. 407, 55 Vroom 407, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 192 (N.J. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error in this case is brought to review a judgment in the Supreme Court entered on a postea from the Camden County Circuit Court to which it was referred for trial. We have examined the errors assigned and deem them to be entirely without merit. The judgment under review will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, ICalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, Treaoy, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The writ of error in this case is brought to review a judgment in the Supreme Court entered on a postea from the Camden County Circuit Court to which it was referred for trial. We have examined the errors assigned and deem them to be entirely without merit. The judgment under review will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, ICalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, Treaoy, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A. 1118, 84 N.J.L. 407, 55 Vroom 407, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hempp-v-f-w-woolworth-co-nj-1913.