Hempp v. F. W. Woolworth & Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Hempp v. F. W. Woolworth & Co.

87 A. 1118, 84 N.J.L. 407, 55 Vroom 407, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 192

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 3, 1913·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error in this case is brought to review a judgment in the Supreme Court entered on a postea from the Camden County Circuit Court to which it was referred for trial. We have examined the errors assigned and deem them to be entirely without merit. The judgment under review will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, ICalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, Treaoy, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The writ of error in this case is brought to review a judgment in the Supreme Court entered on a postea from the Camden County Circuit Court to which it was referred for trial. We have examined the errors assigned and deem them to be entirely without merit. The judgment under review will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, ICalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, Treaoy, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Hempp v. F. W. Woolworth & Co., 87 A. 1118, 84 N.J.L. 407, 55 Vroom 407, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 192 (N.J. 1913).

Pincite

87 A. 1118 (Hempp v. F. W. Woolworth & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.