Hemphill v. Washington State Tax Comm'n
383 U.S. 103, 86 S. Ct. 716
This text of 383 U.S. 103 (Hemphill v. Washington State Tax Comm'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hemphill v. Washington State Tax Comm'n, 383 U.S. 103, 86 S. Ct. 716 (1966).
Opinion
HEMPHILL ET UX., DBA CAPITOL SKATELAND
v.
WASHINGTON STATE TAX COMMISSION.
Supreme Court of United States.
Joel A. C. Rindal for appellants.
John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, Timothy R. Malone, Assistant Attorney General, and H. Eugene Quinn, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
383 U.S. 103, 86 S. Ct. 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hemphill-v-washington-state-tax-commn-scotus-1966.