Hempfling v. LM Communications Inc

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 27, 2006
• Docket: 05-1987
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1987

LEE KENT HEMPFLING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LM COMMUNICATIONS INCORPORATED, a Kentucky Corporation; LM COMMUNICATIONS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INCORPORATED, a Kentucky Corporation; LM COMMUNICATIONS II OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INCORPORATED, a Kentucky Corporation,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-04-1373-2-PMD)

Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 27, 2006

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lee Kent Hempfling, Appellant Pro Se. Greg Horton, BUIST, MOORE, SMYTHE, MCGEE, PA, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Lee Kent Hempfling appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on Hempfling’s employment discrimination action. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Hempfling v. LM Commc’ns, Inc., No. CA-04-1373-2-PMD (D.S.C.

Aug. 31, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -