Hempfling v. LM Communications Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Hempfling v. LM Communications Inc.

172 F. App'x 523

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 27, 2006·No. No. 05-1987·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lee Kent Hempfling appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Hempfling’s employment discrim[524]*524ination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hempfling v. LM Commc’ns, Inc., No. CA-04-1373-2-PMD (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Lee Kent Hempfling appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Hempfling’s employment discrim[524]*524ination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hempfling v. LM Commc’ns, Inc., No. CA-04-1373-2-PMD (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Hempfling v. LM Communications Inc., 172 F. App'x 523 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

172 F. App'x 523 (Hempfling v. LM Communications Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.