Hemopet v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Hemopet v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedSeptember 21, 2015

Docket15-1218

StatusUnpublished

This text of Hemopet v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. (Hemopet v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hemopet v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

HEMOPET, Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________

2015-1218 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 8:12-cv-01908-JLS- JPR, Judge Josephine L. Staton. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

FRANCES S. LEWIS, Susman Godfrey L.L.P., Los Ange- les, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MARC M. SELTZER; JOSEPH SAMUEL GRINSTEIN, JOHN PIERRE LAHAD, Houston, TX.

BRYAN SCOTT HALES, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by DENNIS J. ABDELNOUR, ERIC DAVID HAYES, KRISTINA NICOLE HENDRICKS. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 21, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI