Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hemmis v. State

Hemmis v. State

780 So. 2d 942, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1846, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 540
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 2001
DocketNo. 4D99-2674
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 780 So. 2d 942 (Hemmis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hemmis v. State, 780 So. 2d 942, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1846, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 540 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s convictions on three counts. We reverse his sentence as [943]*943to counts I and II and remand for modification of the sentence.

Appellant sentenced as a prison releasee re-offender, may not also be sentenced as a habitual offender where that sentence is not greater than the prison releasee re-offender sentence. Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000); § 775.082(9)(c), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998); Yehowshua v. State, 773 So.2d 654 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

GUNTHER, STONE, and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Underhill v. State
782 So. 2d 1002 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
780 So. 2d 942, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1846, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hemmis-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.