Hemmis v. State
780 So. 2d 942, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1846, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 540
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 2001·No. No. 4D99-2674·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm Appellant’s convictions on three counts. We reverse his sentence as [943]*943to counts I and II and remand for modification of the sentence.
Appellant sentenced as a prison releasee re-offender, may not also be sentenced as a habitual offender where that sentence is not greater than the prison releasee re-offender sentence. Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000); § 775.082(9)(c), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998); Yehowshua v. State, 773 So.2d 654 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hemmis v. State, 780 So. 2d 942, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1846, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 540 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
780 So. 2d 942 (Hemmis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Underhill v. State
782 So. 2d 1002 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)