Hemmingway v. Town of Dannemora

269 A.D. 798, 55 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3900
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 9, 1945·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Plaintiff secured a verdict against both defendants in this action in negligence to recover for his personal injuries. Thereafter the trial court, as to the .defendant Town, set the verdict aside and dismissed the complaint. Defendant-appellant herein appeals from the judgment against him entered upon the verdict and orders of the Trial Term which denied his [799]*799motions to dismiss the complaint and also to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. The proofs presented sharp questions of fact as to the negligence of said defendant and plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence. The verdict upon those issues is sufficiently supported by evidence. The fairness of the trial questioned by the trial court’s disposition of the action as to the codefendant is rendered academic by our decision in plaintiff’s appeal therefrom, decided herewith. (See Hemmingway v. Town of Dannemora, ante, p. 221.) Orders and judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hemmingway v. Town of Dannemora, 269 A.D. 798, 55 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

269 A.D. 798 (Hemmingway v. Town of Dannemora) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cottingham v. State
182 Misc. 2d 928 (New York State Court of Claims, 1999)