Hemmendinger v. McGann Co.
118 A. 452, 98 N.J.L. 265, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 287
This text of 118 A. 452 (Hemmendinger v. McGann Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hemmendinger v. McGann Co., 118 A. 452, 98 N.J.L. 265, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 287 (N.J. 1922).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
[267]*267For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimeh, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Phillips v. Klein
25 A.2d 289 (Hudson County Circuit Court, N.J., 1942)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
118 A. 452, 98 N.J.L. 265, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hemmendinger-v-mcgann-co-nj-1922.