Hemmendinger v. McGann Co.
118 A. 452, 98 N.J.L. 265, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 287
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
[267]*267For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimeh, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hemmendinger v. McGann Co., 118 A. 452, 98 N.J.L. 265, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 287 (N.J. 1922).
118 A. 452 (Hemmendinger v. McGann Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Phillips v. Klein
25 A.2d 289 (Hudson County Circuit Court, N.J., 1942)