Hemmelweit v. State Ex Rel. Dedge

75 So. 961, 200 Ala. 203, 1917 Ala. LEXIS 379
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 14, 1917
Docket5 Div. 636.
StatusPublished

This text of 75 So. 961 (Hemmelweit v. State Ex Rel. Dedge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hemmelweit v. State Ex Rel. Dedge, 75 So. 961, 200 Ala. 203, 1917 Ala. LEXIS 379 (Ala. 1917).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A majority of the court,' including Justices McClellan, Sayre, Gardner, and Thomas, are of the opinion that the absence of initial jurisdiction by reason of the failure of any search warrant to designate for search the premises on which these liquors were found and seized was cured by the actual seizure and actual presence of the liquors before the court. Being contraband and outlawed — a fact apparent to the court— it was proper for the trial court to execute the sentence of the statute, without regard to the defect mentioned, even though it were conceded that such a defect would be fatal to a proceeding against lawful property.

These cases were submitted with the case of Ben Edmunds v. State, 74 South. 965, 1 and, all other questions here presented having been there decided adversely to appellant, the judgments herein must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

McCLELLAN, SAYRE, GARDNER, and THOMAS, JJ., concur. ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and SOMERVILLE, JJ.,, dissent.
1

199 Ala. 555.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edmunds v. State, ex rel. Dedge
74 So. 965 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 So. 961, 200 Ala. 203, 1917 Ala. LEXIS 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hemmelweit-v-state-ex-rel-dedge-ala-1917.