Hemingway v. Preston

Michigan Court of Chancery

Hemingway v. Preston

1 Walk. Ch. 528

DecidedMarch 15, 1845

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Walk. Ch. 528 (Hemingway v. Preston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hemingway v. Preston, 1 Walk. Ch. 528 (Mich. Ct. App. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The injunction does not require Preston to do any act, but to refrain from doing certain acts. It is wholly negative in its character, and was intended, as is manifest from its language, to prevent him from disturbing or molesting the actual possession or occupancy of complainant; and nothing more. It was not designed to dispossess defendant, or to turn him out of possession, and put complainant in.

Motion denied, with $5 costs to defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

The injunction does not require Preston to do any act, but to refrain from doing certain acts. It is wholly negative in its character, and was intended, as is manifest from its language, to prevent him from disturbing or molesting the actual possession or occupancy of complainant; and nothing more. It was not designed to dispossess defendant, or to turn him out of possession, and put complainant in.

Motion denied, with $5 costs to defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Walk. Ch. 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hemingway-v-preston-michchanct-1845.