Hemingway v. Oldenberg

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Hemingway v. Oldenberg

31 Misc. 782, 65 N.Y.S. 1135

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 31 Misc. 782 (Hemingway v. Oldenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hemingway v. Oldenberg, 31 Misc. 782, 65 N.Y.S. 1135 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record is barren of an exception, and the questions presented by this appeal relate solely to the facts. The [783]*783main question contested at the trial was whether the safe in suit was included in the sale of the plaintiffs’ business to the defendant. The testimony with respect to this point is conflicting, but the trial justice having found in favor of the defendant, we see no reason for disturbing his conclusion.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record is barren of an exception, and the questions presented by this appeal relate solely to the facts. The [783]*783main question contested at the trial was whether the safe in suit was included in the sale of the plaintiffs’ business to the defendant. The testimony with respect to this point is conflicting, but the trial justice having found in favor of the defendant, we see no reason for disturbing his conclusion.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 Misc. 782, 65 N.Y.S. 1135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hemingway-v-oldenberg-nyappterm-1900.