Hemingway v. Inhabitants of Machias

33 Me. 445
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1851·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Wells, J., orally.

— The questions discussed by the counsel are, whether the plaintiff' was liable to the taxation, and, if not, whether a recovery can be had in this form of proceeding.

By law, real estate and also some descriptions of personal property, (among which are oxen and horses,) may be assessed to the party in possession. As to the real estate and as to [446] the oxen and the horse, it is conceded that the assessment upon the plaintiff was lawful. Whether the assessment for the other sorts of personal property was lawful, it is not necessary, in this action, to decide.

G. Walker, for the plaintiff. Thacker, for the defendants.

In cases of mere over-taxation, the remedy is not by an action like this ; but by application for an abatement to the assessors, and, upon their refusal, to the County Commissioners. To that remedy the plaintiff must be referred, for, as he was liable to assessment for the real estate and a part of the personal, the taxation of the other property, even if not authorized, was simply a case of over-taxation.

Plaintiff nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hemingway v. Inhabitants of Machias, 33 Me. 445 (Me. 1851).

33 Me. 445 (Hemingway v. Inhabitants of Machias) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilhelmine' Dennis Oakes v. Town of Richmond
2023 ME 65 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2023)
Perry v. Inhabitants of Town of Lincolnville
99 A.2d 294 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1953)
Board of Com'rs v. Searight Cattle Co.
31 P. 268 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1892)
Stephan v. Daniels
27 Ohio St. (N.S.) 527 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1875)
Christy's Administrator v. City of St. Louis
20 Mo. 143 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1854)