Hemingway v. Inhabitants of Machias
This text of 33 Me. 445 (Hemingway v. Inhabitants of Machias) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The questions discussed by the counsel are, whether the plaintiff' was liable to the taxation, and, if not, whether a recovery can be had in this form of proceeding.
By law, real estate and also some descriptions of personal property, (among which are oxen and horses,) may be assessed to the party in possession. As to the real estate and as to [446]*446the oxen and the horse, it is conceded that the assessment upon the plaintiff was lawful. Whether the assessment for the other sorts of personal property was lawful, it is not necessary, in this action, to decide.
In cases of mere over-taxation, the remedy is not by an action like this ; but by application for an abatement to the assessors, and, upon their refusal, to the County Commissioners. To that remedy the plaintiff must be referred, for, as he was liable to assessment for the real estate and a part of the personal, the taxation of the other property, even if not authorized, was simply a case of over-taxation.
Plaintiff nonsuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 Me. 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hemingway-v-inhabitants-of-machias-me-1851.