Hemingway v. Ball
183 A. 172, 119 N.J. Eq. 471, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 640
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 118 N. J. Eq. 378.
For affirmanc e—The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.
For reversal —None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hemingway v. Ball, 183 A. 172, 119 N.J. Eq. 471, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 640 (N.J. 1936).
183 A. 172 (Hemingway v. Ball) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ferrante v. Philpott
65 A.2d 108 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)
Wolff v. Wolff
34 A.2d 150 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)
Girard Trust Co. v. Schmitz
20 A.2d 21 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1941)
Phillips v. Commissioner
36 B.T.A. 752 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1937)