Hemingway Glass Co. v. Wilkenfeld Brothers, Inc.
226 A.D. 771
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order granting summary judgment and judgment entered thereon reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the separate defense contained in the answer, alleging plaintiff to be a foreign corporation and doing business in this State without authority, raises a question upon which the defendant is entitled to a trial. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hemingway Glass Co. v. Wilkenfeld Brothers, Inc., 226 A.D. 771 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
226 A.D. 771 (Hemingway Glass Co. v. Wilkenfeld Brothers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Mata v. Phœnix Construction Associates
257 A.D. 1091 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)