Hemingway Glass Co. v. Wilkenfeld Brothers, Inc.

226 A.D. 771
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 226 A.D. 771 (Hemingway Glass Co. v. Wilkenfeld Brothers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hemingway Glass Co. v. Wilkenfeld Brothers, Inc., 226 A.D. 771 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Order granting summary judgment and judgment entered thereon reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the separate defense contained in the answer, alleging plaintiff to be a foreign corporation and doing business in this State without authority, raises a question upon which the defendant is entitled to a trial. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Mata v. Phœnix Construction Associates
257 A.D. 1091 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 A.D. 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hemingway-glass-co-v-wilkenfeld-brothers-inc-nyappdiv-1929.