Hembree v. Robertson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Hembree v. Robertson

1943 OK 426, 143 P.2d 1008, 193 Okla. 403, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 423

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 21, 1943

DocketNo. 31538.

StatusPublished

This text of 1943 OK 426 (Hembree v. Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hembree v. Robertson, 1943 OK 426, 143 P.2d 1008, 193 Okla. 403, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 423 (Okla. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the court made after judgment directing the defendant to disclose assets. On the 9th day of August, 1943, the defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss upon jurisdictional grounds. We have examined the authorities cited by *404 movant herein and they reasonably sustain the proposition urged by the defendant in error that the appeal was not perfected by due and proper service of the case-made. Upon such examination we called for a response on the part of the plaintiff in error and no response has been filed.

As held by this court in French v. Bragg, 177 Okla. 43, 55 P. 2d 953, it is not the duty of this court to search for some theory upon which to sustain the jurisdiction to hear the cause.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

CORN, C.J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. GIBSON, V.C.J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the court made after judgment directing the defendant to disclose assets. On the 9th day of August, 1943, the defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss upon jurisdictional grounds. We have examined the authorities cited by *404 movant herein and they reasonably sustain the proposition urged by the defendant in error that the appeal was not perfected by due and proper service of the case-made. Upon such examination we called for a response on the part of the plaintiff in error and no response has been filed.

As held by this court in French v. Bragg, 177 Okla. 43, 55 P. 2d 953, it is not the duty of this court to search for some theory upon which to sustain the jurisdiction to hear the cause.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

CORN, C.J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. GIBSON, V.C.J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1943 OK 426, 143 P.2d 1008, 193 Okla. 403, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hembree-v-robertson-okla-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack