Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Hembree v. Mendenhall

Hembree v. Mendenhall

116 Ohio St. 3d 402
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 3, 2008
DocketNo. 2007-0516
StatusPublished

This text of 116 Ohio St. 3d 402 (Hembree v. Mendenhall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hembree v. Mendenhall, 116 Ohio St. 3d 402 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Vitantonio, Inc. v. Baxter, 116 Ohio St.3d 195, 2007-Ohio-6052, 877 N.E.2d 663.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of O’Donnell, J., in Vitantonio, Inc. v. Baxter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vitantonio, Inc. v. Baxter
116 Ohio St. 3d 195 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 Ohio St. 3d 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hembree-v-mendenhall-ohio-2008.