Heman v. McLaren

28 Mo. App. 654, 1888 Mo. App. LEXIS 44
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 31, 1888
StatusPublished

This text of 28 Mo. App. 654 (Heman v. McLaren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heman v. McLaren, 28 Mo. App. 654, 1888 Mo. App. LEXIS 44 (Mo. Ct. App. 1888).

Opinion

Rombauer, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In conformity with our ruling in the case of Eyerman v. Payne (ante, p. 72), the judgment in this case must be reversed. The suit is founded on a special tax bill issued for work done in paving an alley, and the tax bill, instead of being countersigned by the comptroller, is countersigned thus: “Fred. Gabel, Deputy Comptroller .” In Eyerman v. Payne, we have stated our reasons in full, showing that, under the decisions in this state in analogous cases, no recovery can be had on a special tax bill thus countersigned.

All the judges concurring, the judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Mo. App. 654, 1888 Mo. App. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heman-v-mclaren-moctapp-1888.