Heman v. Farish

71 S.W. 382, 97 Mo. App. 393, 1902 Mo. App. LEXIS 246
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 23, 1902·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BLAND, P. J.

— The suit is on a special taxbill issued against a lot of defendants’ situated on Vandeventer avenue in the city of St. Louis. The petition is in the usual form. The answer was a general denial. The issues were submitted to the court without a jury. The plaintiff read the taxbill in evidence and rested.

The bill is as follows:

[396] 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

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heman v. Farish, 71 S.W. 382, 97 Mo. App. 393, 1902 Mo. App. LEXIS 246 (Mo. Ct. App. 1902).

71 S.W. 382 (Heman v. Farish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Granite Bituminous Paving Co. v. McManus
129 S.W. 448 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1910)