Helwig v. Circuit Judge
This text of 1 McGrath 892 (Helwig v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To vacate a verdict and allow a new trial, where, when the testimony was all in and the parties had rested, the court ad[897]*897journed for the day, and the attorney for the plaintiff failed to appear at the adjourned hour to argue the case, which argument the plaintiff desired to have made and requests to charge presented. ;
Granted January 16, 1889.
Held, that the plaintiff has a right to withdraw his case or abandon his suit at any time before taking the verdict of the jury, and that the circuit judge under the circumstances should have directed a non-suit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 892, 73 McGrath 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helwig-v-circuit-judge-mich-1889.