Helvering v. Supplee

Third Circuit

Helvering v. Supplee

118 F.2d 347, 26 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 703, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4006

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMarch 5, 1941

DocketNos. 7385, 7413

StatusPublished

This text of 118 F.2d 347 (Helvering v. Supplee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Helvering v. Supplee, 118 F.2d 347, 26 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 703, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4006 (3d Cir. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole question presented by the appeals at bar is ruled by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Guggenheim v. Rasquin, 61 S.Ct. 507, 85 L.Ed. -, in favor of the contention of the petitioner.

Accordingly, the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals are reversed and the causes are remanded for determination of taxes in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court which we have cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The sole question presented by the appeals at bar is ruled by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Guggenheim v. Rasquin, 61 S.Ct. 507, 85 L.Ed. -, in favor of the contention of the petitioner.

Accordingly, the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals are reversed and the causes are remanded for determination of taxes in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court which we have cited.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 F.2d 347, 26 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 703, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helvering-v-supplee-ca3-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack