Helvering v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins.

72 F.2d 363, 14 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 450, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4551, 1934 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9383
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 28, 1934
DocketNo. 3443
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 72 F.2d 363 (Helvering v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Helvering v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins., 72 F.2d 363, 14 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 450, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4551, 1934 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9383 (4th Cir. 1934).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition to review a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, which held unconstitutional section 245 (b) of tho Revenue Act of 1926, c. 27, 44 Stat. 9, 47 (26 USCA § 1004 (b), and, in redetermining the taxes of the Jefferson Standard life Insurance Company for the year 1927, allowed deductions from tile income of its office building on account of depreciation and expenses, notwithstanding its failure to include in its gross income the rental value of its office building-computed in accordance with that section. It appears that during the year 1927, tiie company which was engaged in the life insurance business in Greensboro, N. C., owned an office building, a part of which it occupied itself, and part of which it rented to tenants. The book value of this building was $3,069,-498.47. The company received as rents from tenants during the year the sum of $226,262.-73. It incurred expense in connection with the building amounting to $80,645.77 and the depreciation thereon was $34,434. The question involved is whether the company en,n deduct tliis expense and depreciation from its gross income without accounting for the rental value of tho building as income ns provided by tho section of the statute to which we have referred. The Board of Tax Appeals answered this question in the affirmative, on the ground that this section of the statute was unconstitutional; but, in view of tho recent decision of the Supreme Court in Helvering v. Independent Life Ins. Co., 292 U. S. 371, 54 S. Ct. 758, 78 L. Ed. 1311, the decision of the Board must be reversed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 F.2d 363, 14 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 450, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4551, 1934 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helvering-v-jefferson-standard-life-ins-ca4-1934.