Helvering v. Duke

290 U.S. 591, 54 S. Ct. 95
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 23, 1933
DocketNo. 25
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 290 U.S. 591 (Helvering v. Duke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Helvering v. Duke, 290 U.S. 591, 54 S. Ct. 95 (1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Decree affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Mr. Chief Jus[592]*592tice Hughes took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Solicitor General Biggs and Mr. Erwin N. Griswold, with whom Messrs. Sewall Key and Francis H. Horan were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. John W. Davis, with whom Messrs. Wm. R. Perkins, Forrest Hyde, H. H. Shelton,., and Marion N. Fisher were on the brief, for respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Byrum
408 U.S. 125 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Taft v. Commissioner
33 B.T.A. 671 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1935)
Bassett v. Commissioner
33 B.T.A. 182 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1935)
Helvering v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
75 F.2d 416 (Eighth Circuit, 1935)
Tait v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Baltimore
74 F.2d 851 (Fourth Circuit, 1935)
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Schwarz
74 F.2d 712 (Second Circuit, 1935)
Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Baltimore v. Tait
7 F. Supp. 40 (D. Maryland, 1934)
Dort v. Helvering
69 F.2d 836 (D.C. Circuit, 1934)
Helvering v. Wiese
68 F.2d 878 (Eighth Circuit, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
290 U.S. 591, 54 S. Ct. 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helvering-v-duke-scotus-1933.