Helvering v. Duke

290 U.S. 591, 54 S. Ct. 95
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 23, 1933·No. No. 25·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Decree affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Mr. Chief Jus[592] tice Hughes took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Solicitor General Biggs and Mr. Erwin N. Griswold, with whom Messrs. Sewall Key and Francis H. Horan were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. John W. Davis, with whom Messrs. Wm. R. Perkins, Forrest Hyde, H. H. Shelton,., and Marion N. Fisher were on the brief, for respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Helvering v. Duke, 290 U.S. 591, 54 S. Ct. 95 (1933).

290 U.S. 591 (Helvering v. Duke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Byrum
408 U.S. 125 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Taft v. Commissioner
33 B.T.A. 671 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1935)
Bassett v. Commissioner
33 B.T.A. 182 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1935)
Helvering v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
75 F.2d 416 (Eighth Circuit, 1935)
Tait v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Baltimore
74 F.2d 851 (Fourth Circuit, 1935)
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Schwarz
74 F.2d 712 (Second Circuit, 1935)
Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Baltimore v. Tait
7 F. Supp. 40 (D. Maryland, 1934)
Dort v. Helvering
69 F.2d 836 (D.C. Circuit, 1934)
Helvering v. Wiese
68 F.2d 878 (Eighth Circuit, 1934)