Helton v. State

185 So. 864, 135 Fla. 458, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1577
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 27, 1938·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice ELLIS, Mr. Justice WHITFIELD and Mr. Justice TERRELL are of the opinion that the judgment of the Trial Court should be affirmed while Mr. Justice BROWN, Mr. Justice BUFORD and Mr. Justice CHAPMAN are of the opinion that the said judgment should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed, therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton, v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

ELLIS, C.J., and WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and CHAPMAN, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Helton v. State, 185 So. 864, 135 Fla. 458, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1577 (Fla. 1938).

185 So. 864 (Helton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. State
443 So. 2d 1003 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
DeMarie v. Jefferson Stores, Inc.
442 So. 2d 1014 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Rodriguez v. State
396 So. 2d 798 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Gruman v. Bankers Trust Co.
379 So. 2d 658 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Berzin v. State
215 So. 2d 897 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Reid v. Florida Real Estate Commission
188 So. 2d 846 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Kilbee v. State
53 So. 2d 533 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1951)
Maddox v. State
38 So. 2d 58 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)
Cordell v. State
25 So. 2d 885 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1946)