Helton v. Phoenix Insurance Co.
330 So. 2d 724, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4426
Opinion
We tentatively granted jurisdiction in this case on the basis of an apparent conflict of appellate court decisions, under Article V, Section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. Oral argument having been waived and the matter having been fully considered on the parties’ briefs, we now find that the writ was improvidently issued and should be, accordingly, discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Helton v. Phoenix Insurance Co., 330 So. 2d 724, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4426 (Fla. 1976).
330 So. 2d 724 (Helton v. Phoenix Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lincoln Ins. Co. v. Home Emergency Services, Inc.
812 So. 2d 433 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
United Services Auto. Ass'n v. Selz
637 So. 2d 320 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CAS. v. Swindal
622 So. 2d 467 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Allstate Insurance v. Travers
703 F. Supp. 911 (N.D. Florida, 1988)
Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Sievert
361 So. 2d 747 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Roberts v. Carter
350 So. 2d 78 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)