Helsius v. Robertson

629 S.E.2d 851, 360 N.C. 363, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 169
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 2, 2006·No. No. 698P05.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Respondent (County of Durham) on the 20th day of December 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Petitioner (Helsius), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of December 2005 by Respondent (County of Durham) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Helsius v. Robertson, 629 S.E.2d 851, 360 N.C. 363, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 169 (N.C. 2006).

629 S.E.2d 851 (Helsius v. Robertson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKinney v. McKinney
745 S.E.2d 356 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
McKinnon v. CV Industries, Inc.
745 S.E.2d 343 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
Sprinkle v. LILLY INDUSTRIES, INC.
668 S.E.2d 378 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
Hill v. Hill
638 S.E.2d 601 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)