Helsel v. Seeger
34 P. 237, 4 Cal. Unrep. 236
This text of 34 P. 237 (Helsel v. Seeger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Helsel v. Seeger, 34 P. 237, 4 Cal. Unrep. 236 (Cal. 1893).
Opinion
The findings are sufficient to sustain the judgment. The paper found in the transcript and denominated a “bill of exceptions” is not certified by the clerk to be a correct copy of any bill of exceptions on file, nor does it contain any specific exception to any particular finding of the court. Judgment affirmed.
We concur: Fitzgerald, J.; McFarland, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 P. 237, 4 Cal. Unrep. 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helsel-v-seeger-cal-1893.