Helsabeck v. . Vass
155 S.E. 924, 199 N.C. 812, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 274
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Helsabeck v. . Vass. Read the opinion of the Court — 196 N.C. 603 →
Opinion
The trial of the case accords substantially with the opinion rendered on the first appeal, 196 N. C., 603, 146 S. E., 576, and it would serve no useful purpose to reiterate the facts or to restate the contentions of the parties. The record is apparently free from reversible error. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Helsabeck v. . Vass, 155 S.E. 924, 199 N.C. 812, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 274 (N.C. 1930).
155 S.E. 924 (Helsabeck v. . Vass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Helsabeck v. . Vass
146 S.E. 576 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)