Helms v. Stinson Manufacturing Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Helms v. Stinson Manufacturing Co.

892 S.W.2d 757, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1999

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 27, 1994·No. No. 65600·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict in favor of defendant in a products liability case. He raises three points on appeal, all dealing with evidentiary rulings. The evidence to support the verdict was not insufficient. No error of law appears. The claims of evidentiary error were waived and/or not properly preserved for review and/or without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict in favor of defendant in a products liability case. He raises three points on appeal, all dealing with evidentiary rulings. The evidence to support the verdict was not insufficient. No error of law appears. The claims of evidentiary error were waived and/or not properly preserved for review and/or without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Helms v. Stinson Manufacturing Co., 892 S.W.2d 757, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1999 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

892 S.W.2d 757 (Helms v. Stinson Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.