Helms v. Stegeman
This text of 2016 Ohio 5118 (Helms v. Stegeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Helms v. Stegeman, 2016-Ohio-5118.]
STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT )
JOEL HELMS C.A. No. 27995
Appellant
v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE ASHLEY STEGEMAN, et al. BARBERTON MUNICIPAL COURT COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO Appellees CASE No. 15CVG00164
DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
Dated: July 27, 2016
SCHAFER, Judge.
{¶1} Plaintiff-Appellant, Joel Helms, appeals the judgment of the Barberton Municipal
Court awarding Defendants-Appellees, Ashley Stegeman and Christopher Jones (“Appellees”), a
$541.20 rental credit on their counterclaim. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I.
{¶2} Helms operates the CountryView South Apartments located in Green, Ohio.
Appellees were tenants of this apartment complex. On January 30, 2015, Helms filed a pro se
complaint against the Appellees alleging the following three claims: (1) forcible entry and
detainer; (2) damages for several months of unpaid rent; and (3) an injunction prohibiting
Appellees from filing complaints against him with the Summit County Health Department.
{¶3} On February 12, 2015, Appellees responded to Helms’ complaint and filed a
counterclaim alleging a breach of the warranty of habitability, lost wages, slander, and mental
pain and anguish. On February 18, 2015, Helms filed an answer denying Appellees’ 2
counterclaims. Helms also filed a motion for default judgment on his forcible entry and detainer
claim wherein he asserts that Appellees failed to defend against the claim in their answer. The
trial court summarily denied Helms’ motion for default judgment.
{¶4} On the day of trial, Appellees failed to appear despite being served with notice of
the proceeding. Helms appeared pro se and gave testimony on his own behalf. At the
conclusion of the trial, the magistrate entered judgment in favor of Helms in the amount of
$1,977.00. However, the magistrate subsequently stayed its decision upon learning that
Appellees did not appear at trial because Helms told them that he would not appear either.
Appellees apparently believed that Helms would drop his claim for damages if they did not
pursue their counterclaim. The magistrate then scheduled a new trial date.
{¶5} On May 22, 2015, the magistrate held another trial, this time with both parties
present and appearing pro se. The magistrate subsequently issued a new decision entering
judgment in favor of Helms and against the Appellees, jointly and severally, in the amount of
$1,435.80 plus interest on Helm’s claims. The trial court also entered judgment in favor of
Appellees and against Helms in the amount of a $541.20 rent credit on Appellees’ counterclaim.
The magistrate also voided its previous decision. Helms filed timely objections to the
magistrate’s decision. On June 23, 2015, the trial court overruled Helms’ objections to the
magistrate’s decision on the basis that Helms did not file a transcript or affidavit as required by
Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(iii). The trial court also adopted the magistrate’s decision.
{¶6} Helms then filed a notice of appeal, but this Court dismissed the attempted appeal
for lack of jurisdiction because the trial court failed to enter final judgment on Helms’ request for
an injunction in Count Three of his complaint. On remand, the trial court issued an amended 3
judgment entry on September 25, 2015 that disposed of the injunctive relief count. In all other
respects, the entry mirrored the trial court’s initial judgment entry.
{¶7} Helms filed this timely appeal and raises two assignments of error for this Court’s
review. Appellees have not filed an appellate brief in this matter, and thus, we “may accept
[Helms’] statement of the facts and issues as correct and reverse the judgment if [Helms’] brief
reasonably appears to sustain such action.” App.R. 18(C).
II.
Assignment of Error I
Cause Three should have been resolved with a favorable order after defendants failed to answer or defend.
{¶8} In his first assignment of error, Helms argues that the trial court erred by failing to
enter a default judgment against the Appellees on count three of his complaint since their answer
did not defend against that claim. We disagree.
{¶9} Civ.R. 12(A)(1) requires that a defendant serve his or her answer to a complaint
within 28 days of service of the summons and complaint. A party who fails to file a timely
pleading in response to an affirmative pleading runs the risk of having a default judgment
entered against them. Ohio Valley Radiology Assocs., Inc. v. Ohio Valley Hosp. Assn., 28 Ohio
St.3d 118, 121 (1986). Civ.R. 55(A) sets forth the procedures that a trial court must adhere to
prior to entering a default judgment against a party.
{¶10} Here, Helms’ first assignment of error asserts that a default judgment should have
been entered against Appellees with respect to count three of his complaint. However, his
motion for default judgment only requested a default judgment with respect to count one.
Therefore, on this basis alone, we determine that the trial court did not err by denying Helms’
motion for default judgment as it pertains to count three of his complaint. 4
{¶11} Helms’ first assignment of error is overruled.
Assignment of Error II
Defendants offered no credible evidence to support [their] countersuit.
{¶12} In his second assignment of error, Helms contends that the trial court erred by
entering judgment in favor of Appellees on their counterclaim since no credible evidence was
presented to support their claim. In essence, Helms contends that the trial court’s decision is
against the manifest weight of the evidence. However, we do not reach the merits of Helms’
assignment of error since we determine that Helms has not properly preserved this issue for
appellate review.
{¶13} Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(iii) states, in relevant part, that “[a]n objection to a factual
finding, whether or not specifically designated as a finding of fact under Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(a)(ii),
shall be supported by a transcript of all the evidence submitted to the magistrate relevant to that
finding or an affidavit of that evidence if a transcript is not available.” As the trial court properly
noted below, Helms failed to file a transcript or affidavit with the trial court when he filed his
objections to the magistrate's decision. Helms’ objections challenged the magistrate’s factual
determination that Appellees were inconvenienced by the “inconsistent heat” in their apartment
and that they were entitled to a $541.20 rent credit as a result. As such, Helms was required to
file a transcript of the hearing or an affidavit of the evidence before the magistrate pursuant to
Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(iii). Because he failed to do so, the trial court was required to accept the
magistrate's findings of fact and overrule Helms’ objections. Stewart v. Hickory Hills Apts., 9th
Dist. Medina No. 14CA0038-M, 2015-Ohio-5046, ¶ 11, citing Walker v. Lou Restoration, 9th
Dist. Summit No. 26236, 2012-Ohio-4031, ¶ 6. Moreover, in the absence of a properly filed
transcript or affidavit of the evidence, this Court must do the same. Id. 5
{¶14} Accordingly, Helms’ second assignment of error is overruled.
III.
{¶15} With both of Helms’ assignments of error having been overruled, the judgment of
the Barberton Municipal Court is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2016 Ohio 5118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helms-v-stegeman-ohioctapp-2016.