Helms v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Helms v. State

287 S.W. 269, 105 Tex. Crim. 159, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 460

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Helms v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 Tex. Crim. 203 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 9, 1926·No. No. 10320.·Published

Opinions

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for unlawfully possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, punishment one year in the penitentiary.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented to this court for review. The motion for new trial avers newly discovered evidence, to which motion is attached the affidavit of the witnesses. Without the facts proven on the trial before us it is manifest the value of the alleged newly discovered evidence cannot be appraised.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for unlawfully possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, punishment one year in the penitentiary.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented to this court for review. The motion for new trial avers newly discovered evidence, to which motion is attached the affidavit of the witnesses. Without the facts proven on the trial before us it is manifest the value of the alleged newly discovered evidence cannot be appraised.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Helms v. State, 287 S.W. 269, 105 Tex. Crim. 159, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 460 (Tex. 1926).

Pincite

287 S.W. 269 (Helms v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.