Helms v. Picard

Fifth Circuit

Helms v. Picard

229 F.3d 467, 2000 WL 1434674

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 29, 2000

Docket97-30231

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 229 F.3d 467 (Helms v. Picard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Helms v. Picard, 229 F.3d 467, 2000 WL 1434674 (5th Cir. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. Guy Mitchell v. Mary Helms, 530 U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 2530, 147 L.Ed.2d 660 (2000). The Supreme Court reversed our judgment and held that 20 U.S.C. §§ 7301-7303, as applied in Jefferson Parish, is constitutional. By necessary inference, this also reversed our holding that the Louisiana counterpart of that statute, La. Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 17:351-352, was also unconstitutional as applied in Jefferson Parish. Although it vacated our judgment in its entirety, The High Court did not address the other issues decided by us. Helms v. Picard, 151 F.3d 347 (1998).

Accordingly:

We REINSTATE OUR JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants declaring the Louisiana special education program, La.Rev. Stat.Ann. § 17:1941-1956, constitutional as applied in Jefferson Parish.

We REINSTATE OUR JUDGMENT affirming the District Court’s decision in favor of defendants that the transportation payments to the Jefferson Non-Public School Transportation Corporation, by virtue of La.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 17:158 are constitutional.

We RENDER JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants declaring that the Federal instructional materials program, 20 U.S.C. §§ 7301-7373, and its Louisiana counterpart, La.Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 17:351-52, are constitutional as applied in Jefferson Parish.

JUDGMENT RENDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. Guy Mitchell v. Mary Helms, 530 U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 2530, 147 L.Ed.2d 660 (2000). The Supreme Court reversed our judgment and held that 20 U.S.C. §§ 7301-7303, as applied in Jefferson Parish, is constitutional. By necessary inference, this also reversed our holding that the Louisiana counterpart of that statute, La. Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 17:351-352, was also unconstitutional as applied in Jefferson Parish. Although it vacated our judgment in its entirety, The High Court did not address the other issues decided by us. Helms v. Picard, 151 F.3d 347 (1998).

Accordingly:

We REINSTATE OUR JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants declaring the Louisiana special education program, La.Rev. Stat.Ann. § 17:1941-1956, constitutional as applied in Jefferson Parish.

We REINSTATE OUR JUDGMENT affirming the District Court’s decision in favor of defendants that the transportation payments to the Jefferson Non-Public School Transportation Corporation, by virtue of La.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 17:158 are constitutional.

We RENDER JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants declaring that the Federal instructional materials program, 20 U.S.C. §§ 7301-7373, and its Louisiana counterpart, La.Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 17:351-52, are constitutional as applied in Jefferson Parish.

JUDGMENT RENDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 F.3d 467, 2000 WL 1434674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helms-v-picard-ca5-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack