Helms v. Kelly

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Helms v. Kelly

163 So. 2d 3, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4681

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 17, 1964·No. No. 4634·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner recognizes that in Girten v. Bouvier, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 745, this court denied an application for a writ of certiorari under circumstances almost identical to those present here. She urges us to overrule that decision for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion filed by Judge Shannon in that case. After carefully considering the matter we have concluded that the Girten case is controlling and that the present application must be denied for the reasons set forth in our opinion in that case.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., and WHITE and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner recognizes that in Girten v. Bouvier, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 745, this court denied an application for a writ of certiorari under circumstances almost identical to those present here. She urges us to overrule that decision for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion filed by Judge Shannon in that case. After carefully considering the matter we have concluded that the Girten case is controlling and that the present application must be denied for the reasons set forth in our opinion in that case.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., and WHITE and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.

Helms v. Kelly, 163 So. 2d 3, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4681 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

163 So. 2d 3 (Helms v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related