Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Helms v. Kelly

Helms v. Kelly

163 So. 2d 3, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4681
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 17, 1964
DocketNo. 4634
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 163 So. 2d 3 (Helms v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Helms v. Kelly, 163 So. 2d 3, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4681 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner recognizes that in Girten v. Bouvier, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 745, this court denied an application for a writ of certiorari under circumstances almost identical to those present here. She urges us to overrule that decision for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion filed by Judge Shannon in that case. After carefully considering the matter we have concluded that the Girten case is controlling and that the present application must be denied for the reasons set forth in our opinion in that case.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., and WHITE and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Black v. Heininger
163 So. 2d 3 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 So. 2d 3, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helms-v-kelly-fladistctapp-1964.