Helms v. Akron Health Dept., Unpublished Decision (4-21-2004)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Helms v. Akron Health Dept., Unpublished Decision (4-21-2004)

2004 Ohio 2002

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 21, 2004

DocketC.A. No. 21735.

StatusUnpublished

This text of 2004 Ohio 2002 (Helms v. Akron Health Dept., Unpublished Decision (4-21-2004)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Helms v. Akron Health Dept., Unpublished Decision (4-21-2004), 2004 Ohio 2002 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

JOURNAL ENTRY {¶ 1} Appellee has moved this Court to reconsider our decision and journal entry, which was journalized on March 3, 2004. Appellant has not responded to the motion.

{¶ 2} In determining whether to grant a motion for reconsideration, a court of appeals must review the motion to see if it calls to the attention of the court an obvious error in its decision or if it raises issues not considered properly by the court. Garfield Hts. City School Dist. v. State Bd. of Edn. (1992), 85 Ohio App.3d 117. The application for reconsideration is granted. The appeal is reinstated, and the decision and journal entry of this Court dated March 3, 2004 is hereby vacated. This Court shall issue a new decision and journal entry in due course.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOURNAL ENTRY {¶ 1} Appellee has moved this Court to reconsider our decision and journal entry, which was journalized on March 3, 2004. Appellant has not responded to the motion.

{¶ 2} In determining whether to grant a motion for reconsideration, a court of appeals must review the motion to see if it calls to the attention of the court an obvious error in its decision or if it raises issues not considered properly by the court. Garfield Hts. City School Dist. v. State Bd. of Edn. (1992), 85 Ohio App.3d 117. The application for reconsideration is granted. The appeal is reinstated, and the decision and journal entry of this Court dated March 3, 2004 is hereby vacated. This Court shall issue a new decision and journal entry in due course.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2004 Ohio 2002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helms-v-akron-health-dept-unpublished-decision-4-21-2004-ohioctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack