Helms Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Redshaw, Inc.

381 S.E.2d 187, 94 N.C. App. 716, 1989 N.C. App. LEXIS 616
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 18, 1989
DocketNo. 8820DC1189
StatusPublished

This text of 381 S.E.2d 187 (Helms Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Redshaw, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Helms Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Redshaw, Inc., 381 S.E.2d 187, 94 N.C. App. 716, 1989 N.C. App. LEXIS 616 (N.C. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PHILLIPS, Judge.

In appealing from the denial of its motions to dismiss plaintiff’s action and to compel arbitration, defendant failed to comply with our Rules of Appellate Procedure in several respects and the appeal is dismissed. Wiseman v. Wiseman, 68 N.C. App. 252, 314 S.E. 2d 566 (1984). Inter alia, none of defendant’s assignments of error is accompanied by a list of the exceptions upon which it is based and the pages of the record or transcript where they can be found as Rule 10(c) requires; no exceptions follow the judicial actions complained of as Rule 10(b)(1) requires, or appear in any other place in the record for that matter.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges BECTON and LEWIS concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wiseman v. Wiseman
314 S.E.2d 566 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
381 S.E.2d 187, 94 N.C. App. 716, 1989 N.C. App. LEXIS 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helms-insurance-agency-inc-v-redshaw-inc-ncctapp-1989.