Helms Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Redshaw, Inc.
This text of 381 S.E.2d 187 (Helms Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Redshaw, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In appealing from the denial of its motions to dismiss plaintiff’s action and to compel arbitration, defendant failed to comply with our Rules of Appellate Procedure in several respects and the appeal is dismissed. Wiseman v. Wiseman, 68 N.C. App. 252, 314 S.E. 2d 566 (1984). Inter alia, none of defendant’s assignments of error is accompanied by a list of the exceptions upon which it is based and the pages of the record or transcript where they can be found as Rule 10(c) requires; no exceptions follow the judicial actions complained of as Rule 10(b)(1) requires, or appear in any other place in the record for that matter.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
381 S.E.2d 187, 94 N.C. App. 716, 1989 N.C. App. LEXIS 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helms-insurance-agency-inc-v-redshaw-inc-ncctapp-1989.