Helmrich v. Emerson

251 A.D. 723, 297 N.Y.S. 442, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7232

This text of 251 A.D. 723 (Helmrich v. Emerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Helmrich v. Emerson, 251 A.D. 723, 297 N.Y.S. 442, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7232 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

Order denying application for an alternative order of mandamus unanimously affirmed, without costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No question of fact is presented under the petition and the answering affidavit. Present — Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ.; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D. 723, 297 N.Y.S. 442, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helmrich-v-emerson-nyappdiv-1937.