Helmprecht v. Bowen

New York Supreme Court

Helmprecht v. Bowen

34 N.Y.S. 1141, 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 362, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 873

DecidedJune 14, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 34 N.Y.S. 1141 (Helmprecht v. Bowen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Helmprecht v. Bowen, 34 N.Y.S. 1141, 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 362, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 873 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order should be affirmed. It is evident from the affidavits of the plaintiff that he is reckless in his averments. The court is not required to assign an attorney designated by the party applying. Furthermore. the proposed. attorney in the case at bar nowhere agrees to conduct the action "-n. out compensation, as required by section 460 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order should be affirmed. It is evident from the affidavits of the plaintiff that he is reckless in his averments. The court is not required to assign an attorney designated by the party applying. Furthermore. the proposed. attorney in the case at bar nowhere agrees to conduct the action "-n. out compensation, as required by section 460 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 N.Y.S. 1141, 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 362, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helmprecht-v-bowen-nysupct-1895.