Helmly v. Dreisch

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Helmly v. Dreisch

472 So. 2d 888, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1790, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14444

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 23, 1985

DocketNo. 84-2591

StatusPublished

This text of 472 So. 2d 888 (Helmly v. Dreisch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Helmly v. Dreisch, 472 So. 2d 888, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1790, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14444 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final judgment entered for the appellee, defendant below, and order a new trial upon a holding that such judgment was entered and the trial concluded before the plaintiffs concluded the presentation of their evidence to support their claims. We affirm the trial court’s order striking the plaintiffs’ claim for punitive damages. See Lewis v. Guthartz, 428 So.2d 222 (Fla.1982).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part, and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final judgment entered for the appellee, defendant below, and order a new trial upon a holding that such judgment was entered and the trial concluded before the plaintiffs concluded the presentation of their evidence to support their claims. We affirm the trial court’s order striking the plaintiffs’ claim for punitive damages. See Lewis v. Guthartz, 428 So.2d 222 (Fla.1982).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part, and remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

472 So. 2d 888, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1790, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helmly-v-dreisch-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack