Helmly v. Davis

36 S.E. 927, 111 Ga. 860, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 840
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 7, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 36 S.E. 927 (Helmly v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Helmly v. Davis, 36 S.E. 927, 111 Ga. 860, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 840 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Where a motion for a new trial is made in term and ordered heard on a certain day in vacation, and, through no fault on thepart of the movant, is not heard on the day appointed, and no order is.taken extending the time, such motion is, by operation of law, returned to the court and remains until called up in its order. It is error to dismiss such a motion because it was not heard at the appointed time. “ Jurisdiction to proceed in term is not lost by an order to hear at chambers.” Higginbotham v. Campbell, 85 Ga. 639 ; Civil Code, § 5485 ; Dozier v. Owens, 63 Ga. 541; Brantley v. Hass, 69 Ga. 748 ; West v. Tones, 69 Ga. 763 ; Carroll v. Ry. Co., 82 Ga. 452 ; Central R. Co. v. Pool, 95 Ga. 410.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richards v. State
206 S.E.2d 93 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Luke v. Luke
123 S.E. 716 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Moore v. Citizens Bank
91 S.E. 932 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
McPhail v. State
42 S.E. 1001 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 S.E. 927, 111 Ga. 860, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helmly-v-davis-ga-1900.