Helmbright v. Davis

Fourth Circuit

Helmbright v. Davis

201 F. App'x 163

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 28, 2006·No. Nos. 06-1161, 06-1595·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Manuel Helmbright appeals the district court’s orders granting defendant police officers’ motion to dismiss under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and vacating its pre-trial conference and trial schedule in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have re[164]*164viewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Helmbright v. Davis, No. 5:04-cv-00069-FPS, 2006 WL 160810 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 20, 2006; Mar. 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Manuel Helmbright appeals the district court’s orders granting defendant police officers’ motion to dismiss under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and vacating its pre-trial conference and trial schedule in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have re[164]*164viewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Helmbright v. Davis, No. 5:04-cv-00069-FPS, 2006 WL 160810 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 20, 2006; Mar. 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Helmbright v. Davis, 201 F. App'x 163 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

201 F. App'x 163 (Helmbright v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related