Helm v. United Trust Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Helm v. United Trust Co.

820 So. 2d 449, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9623, 2002 WL 1466482

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 10, 2002

DocketNo. 2D01-5471

StatusPublished

This text of 820 So. 2d 449 (Helm v. United Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Helm v. United Trust Co., 820 So. 2d 449, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9623, 2002 WL 1466482 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

GREEN, Judge.

Edward G. Helm argues on appeal that the probate court erred in requiring him to turn over to the appellee, United Trust Company, monies in three accounts. United Trust Company is the personal representative of Mr. Helm’s deceased mother’s estate. Because the probate court did not actually determine whether the accounts are part of the estate, we affirm. This decision shall have no effect as to ownership of the accounts.

Affirmed.

DAVIS and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GREEN, Judge.

Edward G. Helm argues on appeal that the probate court erred in requiring him to turn over to the appellee, United Trust Company, monies in three accounts. United Trust Company is the personal representative of Mr. Helm’s deceased mother’s estate. Because the probate court did not actually determine whether the accounts are part of the estate, we affirm. This decision shall have no effect as to ownership of the accounts.

Affirmed.

DAVIS and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

820 So. 2d 449, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9623, 2002 WL 1466482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helm-v-united-trust-co-fladistctapp-2002.