Helm-Bell v. City of Moline Acres
This text of 356 S.W.3d 883 (Helm-Bell v. City of Moline Acres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Allean Helm-Bell (“Claimant”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) denying her petition for unemployment benefits. Claimant argues the Commission erred in finding she committed misconduct by bringing a visitor into a restricted area.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 S.W.3d 883, 2012 WL 123132, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helm-bell-v-city-of-moline-acres-moctapp-2012.