Helm-Bell v. City of Moline Acres

Missouri Court of Appeals

Helm-Bell v. City of Moline Acres

356 S.W.3d 883, 2012 WL 123132, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 49

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 17, 2012·No. ED 96709·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Allean Helm-Bell (“Claimant”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) denying her petition for unemployment benefits. Claimant argues the Commission erred in finding she committed misconduct by bringing a visitor into a restricted area.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Allean Helm-Bell (“Claimant”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) denying her petition for unemployment benefits. Claimant argues the Commission erred in finding she committed misconduct by bringing a visitor into a restricted area.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Helm-Bell v. City of Moline Acres, 356 S.W.3d 883, 2012 WL 123132, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 49 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

356 S.W.3d 883 (Helm-Bell v. City of Moline Acres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related