Hellums v. Jessup
1912 OK 363, 124 P. 33, 31 Okla. 841, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 161
Opinion
On August 15, 1910, petition in error, with case-made attached, was filed with the clerk of this court, ■and summons in error issued thereon. On May 4, 1912, the defendant in error filed a motion, which motion shows service -upon the plaintiff in error, asking that the appeal be dismissed for failure to comply with rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). This appears not to have been done. The appeal is therefore dismissed. Leavitt et al. v. Commercial National Bank, 26 Okla. 164, 109 Pac. 71.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hellums v. Jessup, 1912 OK 363, 124 P. 33, 31 Okla. 841, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 161 (Okla. 1912).
1912 OK 363 (Hellums v. Jessup) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Leavitt v. Commercial Nat. Bank
1910 OK 140 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)