Hellums v. Jessup

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Hellums v. Jessup

1912 OK 363, 124 P. 33, 31 Okla. 841, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 161

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 14, 1912

Docket1937

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK 363 (Hellums v. Jessup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hellums v. Jessup, 1912 OK 363, 124 P. 33, 31 Okla. 841, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 161 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

WILLIAMS, J.

On August 15, 1910, petition in error, with case-made attached, was filed with the clerk of this court, ■and summons in error issued thereon. On May 4, 1912, the defendant in error filed a motion, which motion shows service -upon the plaintiff in error, asking that the appeal be dismissed for failure to comply with rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). This appears not to have been done. The appeal is therefore dismissed. Leavitt et al. v. Commercial National Bank, 26 Okla. 164, 109 Pac. 71.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WILLIAMS, J.

On August 15, 1910, petition in error, with case-made attached, was filed with the clerk of this court, ■and summons in error issued thereon. On May 4, 1912, the defendant in error filed a motion, which motion shows service -upon the plaintiff in error, asking that the appeal be dismissed for failure to comply with rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). This appears not to have been done. The appeal is therefore dismissed. Leavitt et al. v. Commercial National Bank, 26 Okla. 164, 109 Pac. 71.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK 363, 124 P. 33, 31 Okla. 841, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hellums-v-jessup-okla-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack