Hellman v. Pogue
This text of 13 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 368 (Hellman v. Pogue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A sale of pledged chattels by the pledgee upon notice given only to such persons as he deems liable to be interested in the property and at his private office is not a public sale; and, in the absence of express agreement, if the property be bid off by bim the contract of pledge is not thereby terminated, nor the relations of the parties changed. Bank v. Richardson, 156 Mo., 281; Glidden v. Bank, 53 O. S., 588.
A certificate by the pledgor of such sale subsequent' to' the payment by a surety of two of the judgments secured by the .pledge does not defeat the right of the surety to be subrogated to the fights of the judgment creditor or pledgee in the property pledged. Sec. 5386, R. S.; Hill v. King, Executor, 48 O. S., 75.
Decree for plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hellman-v-pogue-ohcircthamilton-1909.