Hellman v. Hellman

Connecticut Appellate Court

Hellman v. Hellman

543 A.2d 307, 15 Conn. App. 816, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 266

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedJune 23, 1988

Docket6249

StatusPublished

This text of 543 A.2d 307 (Hellman v. Hellman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hellman v. Hellman, 543 A.2d 307, 15 Conn. App. 816, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 266 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant appeals from the trial court’s pendente lite awards of alimony and child support.

The defendant contends that the trial court erred (1) in finding that it had jurisdiction over the defendant, and (2) in ruling on the plaintiff’s motion for alimony and support, pendente lite, without a showing of a substantial change in circumstances.

Neither claim of error has merit. The defendant was personally served in Connecticut and our review of the record, transcript and briefs clearly indicates that the trial court properly exercised its broad discretion and fashioned its awards in conformity with applicable law.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant appeals from the trial court’s pendente lite awards of alimony and child support.

The defendant contends that the trial court erred (1) in finding that it had jurisdiction over the defendant, and (2) in ruling on the plaintiff’s motion for alimony and support, pendente lite, without a showing of a substantial change in circumstances.

Neither claim of error has merit. The defendant was personally served in Connecticut and our review of the record, transcript and briefs clearly indicates that the trial court properly exercised its broad discretion and fashioned its awards in conformity with applicable law.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

543 A.2d 307, 15 Conn. App. 816, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hellman-v-hellman-connappct-1988.